HillRunner.com SuperCalc
For Club HillRunner.com members: Get the most popular parts of the HillRunner.com Calculators in a single, easy to use calculator!
Offshoring Development Funding
by on Saturday, October 19, 2013  (1 comment)

Now I am far from an isolationist, competitively speaking. I am all for scholarship runners from outside the U.S. competing in the NCAA/NAIA and certainly welcome top competition from across the globe coming to top U.S. races to compete. I see those aspects as enhancing domestic talent development, at the top of the sport it gives U.S. runners a higher bar to aspire towards. However, a report was recently shared with me that left me rather puzzled. While I can recognize that the supporters behind the efforts to give some Kenyan athletes a leg-up have their hearts in the right place -- and, after all, it is their money to spend as they see fit -- I have to wonder why there is this type of push to support good-yet-not-great elite runners in the world of elite marathoning (perhaps a generous assessment) from Kenya instead of a crowdfunding effort for U.S. runners at that level. The two runners in question have run 2:21 and 2:30+ which, even at altitude in the U.S., would not be considered on the cusp of world class performances for men. It is not as if there are not agents and coaches combing the Kenyan countryside for talent to develop and bring to marathons in Europe, Asia, and the U.S. already, there is a scouting and development system that has been in place for many, many years, as attested to by the world class results from Kenyan runners for the past four decades or so. If there are African runners who are not getting the opportunity to compete abroad, it is far more likely that they are simply not (yet) good enough to warrant that investment rather than having slipped through the cracks in the system.

Comparatively, there is little in the way of a system of talent identification and development in the U.S. for the marathon. There are sponsored training groups here, certainly, yet they are small in number and have limited funding and space. On top of that, this effort will bring these Kenyan runners to a race to compete with national-class and regional-class U.S. runners -- many of whom hold down jobs to make ends meet -- for a rare substantial marathon payday for runners at that level. This effort is subsidizing talent not good enough for any number of agents to take to any level of prize-money road race in Europe or Asia to come to a race in the U.S. and compete with U.S. runners in one of the few races that stands in support of grassroots development here. Now I honestly hope that the two Kenyans come in and run sub-2:15 and contend for the win, as long as they will be coming I genuinely wish them success. I am just grasping for the logic why this endeavor would be a more worthy expenditure by the U.S. running community over doing the same for our own runners. Is this outlook a short, slippery-slope away from viewpoints that desire U.S.-only prize purses at all domestic races or want to see scholarships at U.S. colleges and universities reserved exclusively for U.S. athletes?

Quote this postQuote
Share: Share this page on Facebook Share this page on Twitter Share this page on Twitter
1 comment

Somehow I missed this post until now. I agree with you on all accounts. I wish these Kenyan runners the best but the results make it obvious that the Kenyan system of talent identification and development is superior to the US system.

While I was never a 2:20-2:30 marathoner, I wasn't far from that range and I did get to know quite a few runners who were in that range. What saddened me was the lack of support they got. They were literally on their own, absolutely no support from anywhere. Why not support these runners? The same amount of money could go a lot further in offering some support to a 2:30 runner in the US and sending him to California than in doing the same for a 2:30 runner from Kenya.

I suppose this viewpoint could be considered a slippery slope toward US-only prize purses and US-only scholarships and I don't want to go down that route. I also don't want to sound isolationist. I just think the Kenyan running community has proven that its talent identification and development is already far superior to ours. Instead of trying to find someone from Kenya who slipped through the thin cracks, why not try to find someone from the US who fell into one of the many gaping chasms in our "system"?

Quote this commentQuote
Post a comment as a guest:
Note: Guest posts are moderated. Your post will not appear immediately.
Your name:
Your email (will not be displayed):
Bold ([b]text[/b]) Italics ([i]text[/i]) Underline ([u]text[/u]) Center ([center]text[/center]) Quote ([quote]text[/quote]) Insert image ([img]URL[/img]) Insert link ([url]address[/url] OR [url=address]text[/url])

Share: Share this page on Facebook Share this page on Twitter Share this page on Twitter Follow: Follow HillRunner.com on Facebook Follow HillRunner.com on Twitter Follow HillRunner.com on Google+